Your Assets Have Wheels: Why Your Fleet Maintenance Needs to Be in Your CMMS
Industry experts explain why separating fleet maintenance from your facility CMMS is a costly mistake and how unifying them boosts equipment reliability and cuts costs.
MaintainNow Team
August 2, 2025

It’s 8:00 AM on a Tuesday. The operations director just got a frantic call—a critical air handler at the main production facility is down, and the temperature is already climbing. At the same time, the logistics coordinator flags that a delivery truck, one of your key revenue-generating assets, won’t start. It’s sitting dead in the yard, loaded with product that now won’t make its scheduled drop.
For most maintenance and facility managers, this is a familiar, gut-wrenching scenario. Two critical assets down, two separate streams of chaos. The HVAC work order goes into the CMMS software. Technicians are dispatched, parts are checked, and a digital trail begins. The truck? That’s a different story. It likely involves a phone call to the fleet manager (if there is one), a search through a three-ring binder for service history, and a work order scribbled on a carbon-copy form or tracked in a completely separate, often archaic, spreadsheet.
This disconnect is more than an inconvenience. It’s a quiet, insidious drain on resources, a major blind spot in operational oversight, and a significant barrier to achieving true equipment reliability across an organization. The industry has, for decades, treated assets with wheels differently from assets with foundations. We’ve put them in separate digital garages, managed by different rules and tracked with different tools. This is a profound and costly mistake. Your vehicles—your service vans, delivery trucks, forklifts, yellow iron—are not a separate category of responsibility. They are a vital part of your asset ecosystem, and their maintenance needs to live in the same place as everything else: your Computerized Maintenance Management System.
The Silos are Costing More Than You Think
The separation of fleet and facility maintenance is often a historical accident. Fleet management grew out of logistics and transportation departments, while facility maintenance grew out of engineering and plant operations. Their respective management tools evolved in parallel, never designed to speak to each other. In today’s data-driven environment, this legacy structure is actively undermining maintenance strategy and financial performance.
The most immediate and visible cost is duplicated effort and administrative bloat. Organizations running two separate systems are paying for two software licenses, two sets of training, and two administrative overheads to manage them. But the real costs are buried deeper. Consider parts inventory management. A facility CMMS holds meticulous records for belts, filters, and motors for an AHU. A separate fleet system—or worse, a spreadsheet—tracks a near-identical set of filters, belts, and fluids for a fleet of Ford Transit vans.
What happens when a filter is a common part for both a generator set and a light-duty truck? Nothing. The systems have no way of knowing. So, you double-order. You have capital tied up in redundant inventory, sitting on two different shelves in two different stockrooms, completely invisible to the other half of the maintenance team. A technician working on a facility generator might have to wait a day for a part delivery, unaware that the exact same part is sitting 50 feet away in the fleet garage. This isn’t a hypothetical; it’s a daily reality in thousands of operations, a death-by-a-thousand-cuts scenario for wrench time and efficiency.
Then there’s the problem of holistic performance analysis. The finance department wants to understand the total cost of ownership (TCO) for a specific site or business unit. They can pull data from the CMMS for the facility assets—maintenance labor, parts costs, contractor invoices. But the fleet costs? That data is locked away in another system, formatted differently, and often incomplete. It requires a manual, error-prone process of exporting, merging, and praying the data aligns. The result is almost always an approximation, not a precise accounting. You can’t accurately assess the profitability of a service route if you can’t accurately attribute the maintenance costs of the vehicle running it. You’re flying blind.
This data segregation cripples any attempt at a sophisticated maintenance strategy. How can a maintenance director optimize technician scheduling when they can’t see that a single technician with a multi-trade skill set could perform a building PM and a vehicle inspection in the same trip to a remote site? They can’t. So, two separate trips are scheduled. Two separate travel times. Two chunks of lost productivity. The cost of fuel, the wear-and-tear on a second service vehicle—it all adds up, lost in the noise of departmental divides. Run-to-failure becomes the default, not because it’s a strategic choice, but because the systems in place make proactive, coordinated planning nearly impossible.
A Single Source of Truth for Every Wrench Turned
The operational argument for unifying fleet and facility maintenance in a single CMMS is overwhelmingly compelling. It’s about creating a single source of truth for every asset, every work order, and every dollar spent on maintenance, regardless of whether the asset has roots or wheels. When a service van is treated as just another asset in the hierarchy, right alongside chillers and boilers, a powerful transformation occurs.
Suddenly, work order management becomes universal. A request to fix a leaking hydraulic line on a forklift looks and feels exactly the same as a request to repair a broken door closer. The workflow—from request, to approval, to planning, to assignment, to completion—is standardized. This dramatically simplifies training for both technicians and administrative staff. There’s one system to learn, one process to follow. The tribal knowledge previously locked in the fleet garage is now digitized, standardized, and accessible to the entire maintenance organization.
The impact on labor optimization is immediate. A unified scheduler can now see the entire landscape of work and the full availability of technicians. Maybe the lead mechanic who is a wizard with diesel engines also has a knack for troubleshooting complex pump controls. With a unified CMMS, that skill set is visible and deployable across all asset types. Geographic optimization becomes a reality. A system like MaintainNow, with its powerful mobile maintenance capabilities, can map out all open work orders—facility and fleet—allowing a supervisor to create a daily run for a field technician that logically groups tasks by location. The result is a massive increase in productive wrench time and a sharp decrease in windshield time.
Inventory management becomes a strategic function rather than a source of frustration. With one central parts database, organizations can leverage their full purchasing power. They can identify common parts across asset classes and set realistic reorder points based on total enterprise consumption, not siloed guesses. When a technician needs a part, whether they’re in the boiler room or in the vehicle bay, they check one system. The CMMS tells them if it’s in stock, where it is, and can even reserve it for their work order. This simple capability eliminates countless hours of searching and prevents the costly emergency procurements that destroy maintenance budgets.
Furthermore, reporting and analytics ascend to a new level of value. When all maintenance data—labor hours, parts costs, failure codes, downtime—resides in one database, the insights that can be extracted are profound. A maintenance director can finally compare the lifecycle cost of a Caterpillar generator against a Cummins-powered haul truck. They can identify which asset classes are consuming the most resources and why. They can generate a single, credible report for senior leadership that shows the complete picture of maintenance performance and its impact on the business. This is the foundation of genuine maintenance management, moving from a reactive fire-fighting function to a proactive, value-driving business partner.
From Oil Changes to Predictive Intelligence
Integrating fleet into a modern CMMS isn't just about consolidating existing, basic maintenance tasks. It’s about unlocking a level of fleet management that is simply unattainable with spreadsheets or outdated standalone software. The real power move is to leverage the advanced capabilities of a contemporary CMMS platform to transform fleet maintenance from a reactive, schedule-based activity into an intelligent, condition-based, and ultimately predictive discipline.
The most significant leap forward comes from telematics integration. Nearly every modern commercial vehicle, from a light-duty van to a piece of heavy construction equipment, is equipped with telematics hardware that broadcasts a torrent of valuable data: GPS location, engine hours, idle time, fuel consumption, and, most critically, diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs). In a siloed world, this data either goes nowhere or sits in a separate portal viewed only by a fleet administrator.
When integrated with a CMMS, this data becomes actionable maintenance intelligence. Imagine a scenario: A delivery truck on its route throws a fault code indicating an abnormal exhaust gas temperature. Instead of waiting for the driver to notice a check engine light (or worse, for the truck to go into limp mode on the highway), the telematics system sends an alert directly to the CMMS. The CMMS, using predefined rules, can automatically generate a high-priority work order, identify the specific fault, suggest a list of potential parts, and even assign it to the technician best qualified to handle diesel aftertreatment systems. The maintenance team is now ahead of the failure. That’s the difference between a planned, 2-hour repair in the shop and an unplanned, 8-hour roadside breakdown with a tow bill and a ruined delivery schedule.
This integration is a cornerstone of modern CMMS platforms like MaintainNow, which are designed as open, connected hubs rather than closed databases. Through APIs (Application Programming Interfaces), they can seamlessly ingest data from virtually any telematics provider—Geotab, Samsara, Verizon Connect, you name it. This turns the CMMS into the central nervous system for asset health. Meter readings for Preventive Maintenance (PM) scheduling are no longer dependent on a driver remembering to write down the odometer. The CMMS pulls the mileage or engine hours directly from the vehicle, automatically triggering a work order when a PM threshold is met. This ensures maintenance is done when it’s needed—not too early, which wastes resources, and not too late, which risks failure.
Compliance and safety also become far easier to manage. For any organization operating commercial vehicles, DOT inspections, emissions testing, and safety checks are non-negotiable. A unified CMMS can manage these compliance tasks as recurring PMs, scheduling them, tracking their completion, and storing the digital records required for an audit. The system can house all documentation, from registration and insurance certificates to driver vehicle inspection reports (DVIRs), linked directly to the asset record. This creates an unassailable audit trail and dramatically reduces the administrative burden of compliance management.
Finally, let’s talk about a truly unified asset lifecycle management strategy. A best-in-class CMMS tracks an asset from the moment of acquisition. For a vehicle, this means recording the purchase price, warranty information, and upfitting costs. Over its life, every single cost—every oil change, every tire rotation, every major engine repair, every gallon of fuel—is logged against that specific asset record. When it comes time to decide whether to repair or replace that aging truck, the decision is no longer based on guesswork or sentiment. The maintenance director can pull up a complete, cradle-to-grave financial and operational history. They can see its cost-per-mile, its mean time between failures (MTBF), and its total maintenance spend, and compare that against its replacement cost and the reliability of newer models. This is data-driven decision making, and it’s only possible when facility and fleet data live under one roof.
Making the Unification a Reality
Acknowledging the benefits of an integrated system is the easy part. The practical implementation can seem daunting, especially for organizations entrenched in decades of operational inertia. It requires a thoughtful approach, a solid plan, and a CMMS partner that understands the nuances of both the shop floor and the field.
The first step is a strategic shift in mindset. Leadership must champion the idea that a vehicle is just another asset. This isn’t a fleet project or a facilities project; it’s an organizational equipment reliability project. Without this top-down buy-in, any effort to break down silos will be met with resistance.
The next, more tactical step is data standardization and migration. This is where the work really begins. You need to create a single, logical asset hierarchy that incorporates mobile assets. A common approach is to structure it geographically (Site > Building > Area) and then add a "Mobile Assets" category at the site level. Underneath this, vehicles can be categorized by type (e.g., Light Duty Trucks, Forklifts, Heavy Equipment). The key is consistency. A Ford F-150 at one site needs to be classified the same way as an F-150 at another.
For fleet assets, adopting a standard like the Vehicle Maintenance Reporting Standards (VMRS) is a game-changer. VMRS provides a universal coding system for components, reasons for repair, and tasks performed. Implementing VMRS codes within the CMMS ensures that data is captured consistently, regardless of which technician is doing the work. A "Code 33-013-007" always means replacing a brake pad, making data analysis across the entire fleet incredibly powerful and precise. While it requires initial training, the long-term payoff in data quality is immense.
Technician adoption is perhaps the most critical success factor. Fleet mechanics who are accustomed to paper work orders or a familiar (if clunky) old system may be resistant to change. The key is to demonstrate how the new system makes their job easier, not harder. This is where a world-class mobile CMMS app is not just a feature, but a necessity. Providing technicians with a tablet or smartphone running an intuitive app, like the one offered by MaintainNow at app.maintainnow.app, is crucial. It allows them to pull up work orders, view asset service histories, access digital manuals, and log their work right at the vehicle. No more greasy paper. No more walking back to a desktop to close out a job. The mobile tool must be fast, easy to use, and reliable, even in areas with poor connectivity. When technicians see that the new system gives them more information and cuts down on their administrative busywork, they become its biggest advocates.
The line between a fixed asset and a mobile one is a construct of old management thinking. In the modern operational landscape, that line has not just blurred; it has been erased by the demands for greater efficiency, data transparency, and enterprise-wide equipment reliability. A delivery truck is just as critical to generating revenue as the conveyor belt inside the building. A service van is as essential to uptime as the technician who drives it.
Managing these wheeled assets in a separate system is an outdated practice that introduces risk, hides costs, and hampers performance. The future of effective, cost-efficient maintenance management lies in a unified approach. It’s about viewing every piece of equipment your organization depends on through a single lens, managed by a single system, and guided by a single, coherent maintenance strategy. Bringing your fleet into your CMMS is no longer an innovative idea. It is a fundamental requirement for any organization serious about optimizing its maintenance operations and protecting its bottom line. Your assets have wheels; it's time your maintenance strategy caught up to them.